U.S. tied too closely to Israel

Too close to Israel

Joshua Stein

Letters | The Calgary Herald | September 15, 2001

I used to live two blocks from the World Trade Center, and saw this tragedy coming years ago. Each year that passed, I was thankful and amazed it hadn’t happened yet.

Here’s why: The U.S. should never have tied itself so closely to Israel. As in European countries, U.S. media and politicians should have condemned Israel’s antagonism and unreasonable attitude toward Palestinian concerns.

Reaction to the Jewish Holocaust has created a blind spot. This blind spot has led American astray into foreign political attitudes that are opposite to the very ideals the U.S. was built on.

The best of modern American is about co-existence. It’s about moderation and tolerance.

11-year search gathers relatives

By Carmen Duarte, ARIZONA DAILY STAR

Wednesday September 12 05:28 AM EDT

Local — The Arizona Daily Star — updated 5:28 AM ET Sep 12

At age 10, Nadia Larsen asked her father about his family, separated by World War II, because she longed to know her roots.

All he told her was that she came from “blue blood,” but the girl replied that her blood was red.

Larsen, now 46 and part of a reunification effort by the American Red Cross (news — web sites) Holocaust and War Victims Tracing and Information Center, finally understands what her father meant.

The Sabino Canyon-area resident returned last week from Poland, where she met her father’s family, including two half- brothers. Her father, Romuald Dombrowski, came from a wealthy, aristocratic family.

“I finally have a family,” Larsen said Tuesday from her home. “It feels great. I still cry.”

It took 3,000 hours of research on the Internet and the help of the Red Cross war victims center to locate relatives.

Larsen is one of two people in Southern Arizona reunited this year with relatives lost during the Holocaust and the war, said Rebecka Wendling, a spokeswoman for the American Red Cross Southern Arizona Chapter.

Since last year, the Baltimore-based center has received 48 new cases from Southern Arizona. Across the nation, the center has reunited nearly 1,000 survivors with their relatives, Wendling said.

Larsen recalled the empty feeling she had as a child growing up in Tel Aviv. Both her parents were World War II refugees.

Her father was placed into the Polish forces under British command. “He was in Iran, Iraq and ended up in Palestine, which later became Israel,” Larsen said.

Her mother, Nina Dombrowski, who is 79, was separated from her family as a teen-ager and put to work on a German farm.

Her parents met through friends in Jerusalem. They married in 1954, and eventually ran a successful steakhouse in Tel Aviv. Larsen’s father died of lung cancer in 1985.

Neither spoke about their family. “I had no grandparents, nieces, nephews and cousins. I had nothing — only my parents, a brother and sister.

Eleven years ago, Larsen, a former businesswoman who speaks five languages and is an interpreter, searched for her mother’s family. She found and met five relatives in Belarus, part of the former Soviet Union.

Two years ago, she began the search for her father’s family.

For Larsen, finding her father’s 18 relatives has made her feel whole. She picked up clues through the British Ministry of Defense in London, where she obtained his military records, including two war medals on behalf of her father.

She learned about her grandparents, Tomasz Adam and Kazimiera Maria Dombrowski, who had three children. She also learned about her father’s first wife and two sons.

Larsen met her aunt and half-brothers through letters. She also met a New Jersey cousin who will visit here next month.

Now, she has 150 photographs and 10 videocassettes. Her family has been introduced to different Polish foods and champagnes.

Larsen is working on learning Polish so she can speak to her relatives in their native tongue.

“I am staying in touch with them. I feel so good,” Larsen said.

Abusing the Holocaust

(September 11) — Lucy Dawidowicz, the late Holocaust historian, recalled that one day she received a phone call from a young man affiliated with Larry King’s American national talk-radio program. She was asked if she would be prepared to debate Robert Faurisson, a well-known anti-Semite who denies that Jews were killed in the Holocaust. Dawidowicz replied that Faurisson should not be provided a platform for his virulent anti-Semitism.

The young man, puzzled, approached Dawidowicz again. What was the matter with discussing “controversial” matters on the radio? Dawidowicz asked the young man if he “thought that the murder of European Jews was a ‘controversial’ matter?” Had it not been established as a historical fact? “I don’t know,” he answered, “I wasn’t around at the time. I am only 30 years old!”

Far more problematic than such a lapse in historical awareness is the perversion of the Holocaust to such an extent that it is turned against the Jews, as was the case at the United Nations Conference on Racism, and as articulated by the UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan in his brutal statement that the Holocaust does not give the right to Israelis (read: Jews) to carry out another Holocaust against the Palestinians. (Please spare me from the hypocrisy of the African nations which have been committing genocide against each other for years.)

It is not enough that the Louis Farrakhans and the David Irvings of this world spew forth their virulent anti-Semitism by either denying the Holocaust or belittling it, now we have political figures such as Annan leading the fray. Annan, the Finnish foreign minister, and all the Muslim countries have promulgated the disgusting notion that we Israelis are the new Nazis, and the Palestinians the new Jews.

This sort of transference is nothing less than abhorrent. (Not to mention that we are no match for the Arab brutality against each other: Jordan killing 20,000 Palestinians in one week, or Syria killing 5,000 Christians in two days!) But such transference has received its “respectable” cover for years, even in the United States, through a more subtle, but equally distorted interpretation of the Holocaust — and that is the universalization of the tragedy.

In the late 1960s, during the height of the Vietnam War, a number of plays appeared on Broadway by such notable playwrights as Arthur Miller, Peter Weiss and Robert Shaw. In each play, the writer used the Holocaust to illustrate man’s inhumanity to man. During the 1960s, the Holocaust became equal to the napalming of the Vietnamese countryside, persecution against Blacks, Communist baiting, and yes, suppression of Arabs by Israelis. Shaw himself wrote in 1968: “I see Auschwitz as a universal instrument that could have been used by anyone. For that matter, the Jews could have been on the side of the Nazis.”

It is amazing how one can start out with a seemingly logical formula and misapply it so that it becomes venomous drivel. Must the innocent absorb the guilt for some lame social comment about universal guilt and responsibility by an act of introjection in order that the real guilty ones be absolved?

Any theme that holds that “things equal to the same thing are equal to each other” is pure nonsense. If everyone is guilty, then no one is guilty. Such a universal claim perverts any meaningful understanding of the Holocaust and denies the Jewish people a measure of exclusivity in its suffering for the evils of the Nazis and the silence of the world. Such was the case with the exaggerated comparison between Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and Hitler that US president George Bush Sr. made during the Gulf War.

Few times in history has a single event elicited such diverse public attitudes as has the wanton slaughter of more than six million Jews, as so sickeningly displayed at the UN Conference. The murder of the six million cannot be wholly accounted for either in terms of passion or of madness or of overwhelming and irresistible social forces. But one thing is certain, the Holocaust is an event of such magnitude that its wounds can never be healed.

The best we can do is to never let it fade from our consciousness, and most definitely, never let it be abused beyond recognition.

The capacity to assume the burden of preserving the Holocaust is not always practical. While the moral function of recounting the Holocaust cuts across the different worlds of art, knowledge, reason and history, it must always respect basic truths. The world owes us the memory of the simple fact that the Nazi slaughter of the Jews is objectively the supreme tragic event of modern times.

This must be the prime remembrance of that dark period in history. Anything less than this will surely set the stage for legitimizing another Holocaust against the Jews — disguised as a legitimate political attack on Israel and its policies vis-à-vis the Palestinians.

(The writer is the spokesman for the Rabbis for Human Rights group.)


Source:

The Jerusalem Post

By David J. Forman

September, 11 2001

Rabbi Says Pope Saved More Jews From Holocaust than Schindler

(CNSNews.com) — A Jewish rabbi has told the annual meeting of an international Catholic organization that “[Pope] Pius XII saved more Jewish lives than any other person, including Raoul Wallenberg and Oskar Schindler,” contrary to press accounts over the last several years that claimed Pius XII did little or nothing to prevent the holocaust. Several Jewish organizations have also criticized Pius XII for his alleged failure to act.

Rabbi Dr. David Dalin, a Jewish historian and former professor at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, made the comments August 23rd while speaking to the international lay Catholic organization Communion and Liberation,

The Jewish people had no greater friend in the 20th Century [than Pope Pius XII],” he said.

[…]


Source:

By John Rossomando

CNSNews.com Staff Writer

September 04, 2001

U.N. Chief Tells Israel to Stop Using Holocaust to Justify Its Policies

By Mark Klusener

CNSNews.com Correspondent

August 31, 2001

Durban, South Africa (CNSNews.com) — U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan called on Israel Friday to stop using the Holocaust as a reason to continue what he said were policies of occupation, displacement, and extra-judicial killings of Palestinians.

[…]

CNS London Bureau Chief Patrick Goodenough contributed to this report.

Book refutes anti-Semitism of Pope Pius XII

Historian says Roman Catholic leader once targeted by Hitler

(WorldNetDaily, 8/30/2001) — For decades, critics have expressed resentment and outrage over reports that Pope Pius XII, who led the Catholic Church during World War II, did little or nothing to help Jews escape the terror of Adolph Hitler and the Nazis.

However, in a new book, “Pius XII, Pope of the Jews,” Italian historian Andrea Tornielli claims that in reality Hitler ordered the destruction of the Vatican and the deportation of Pius XII to Liechtenstein in 1943, in reprisal for the Pontiff’s reported assistance to Jews and for the Church’s opposition to the Nazi regime.

According to the Zenit, the Vatican’s news organization, Tornielle explains in his book — which has just gone on sale in Italy — that Hitler was livid after the signing of the armistice between the Italian Badoglio government and the Allies on Sept. 8, 1943, and ordered the SS to destroy the Holy See with “blood and fire.”

Former Italian Minister Giulio Andreotti defended the validity of Tornielli’s thesis last week when he addressed the meeting of the Catholic movement, Communion and Liberation, Zenit said.

Much of the criticism leveled against Pius XII was that he was too passive in the face of Nazism during World War II, but Zenit reported that Andreotti defended the pope.

“The hostility against Pope Pacelli was not due to his weakness against Nazism, but to his rejection of Communism,” he said to the gathering in Rimini, Italy, Zenit reported.

The Italian historian’s arguments had already been mentioned and noted in recent years by other historians and scholars who quoted testimonies and documents from the time of Nazi occupation, said Zenit.

Among Pius XII’s defenders is Antonio Gaspari, author of “The Jews, Pius XII, and the Black Legend,” “which offers testimonies of Jews in Rome who were saved from the Nazi-Fascist persecution thanks to the help of men and women of the Church, as requested by Pius XII himself,” said the Vatican news agency.

Eugenio Pacelli, Pius XII, died Oct. 9, 1958, in the papal summer residence of Castel Gandolfo, after a 19-year pontificate. The process of beatifying him — one of the first requirements leading to his proclamation as a saint — is already underway, Vatican officials say, but is opposed by Jewish critics and some current members of the Israeli government.

Pius XII’s actions helped save more than 800,000 Jewish lives, either directly or indirectly, according to Jewish researcher Pinchas Lapide, Zenit reported.

Furthermore, the news agency said, the pontiff was actively involved in the German resistance’s effort to remove Hitler, as evidenced in British Foreign Office documents of the time.

Auschwitz was not a ‘death camp’

The German Trauma: Experiences and Reflections 1938-2001

The Times

WEDNESDAY AUGUST 29 2001

By Gitta Sereny

Penguin, £8.99; 416 pp

ISBN 0140292632

  • Gitta Sereny has spent a lifetimes exploring the worst aspects of humanity, and has faced many terrible truths. Yet she has never lost her belief in the possibility of redemption. She talks to Erica Wagner

[…]

I am not surprised that her correspondents want to talk further with her — her books are powerful in that they are dialogues not only with her subjects but with her readers and herself. If she appears to have a high opinion of herself, she has the same opinion of her readers — but her trust that they will be able to be as intelligent and thoughtful as she is has not always been justified, especially in the case of Mary Bell. Her evident sympathy with the woman Bell had become (and her publishers’ payment of Bell for her time) gained her much opprobrium. Her ruthless desire to stick to the facts — that, say, Auschwitz was not a “death camp” — has not always won her friends. She is particularly scathing about the identification of Hitler’s evil with the death of the Jews and only the Jews. She deplores the use of the word “holocaust”, she says.

I deplore it because what happened to the Jews was the worst thing that was done — but it has now become the only thing. And that is totally wrong. If one wants to be disgustingly numerical, one would have to say that Hitler killed more Christians than Jews. But we don’t want to be like that. It’s all wrong. But if we concentrate entirely on what happened to the Jews, we cannot see its parallels — and you know many in the Jewish community refuse to see such parallels because they think it diminishes their suffering. But it’s not just terrible to kill Jews — it’s terrible to kill anybody. This whole thing of the murder of the Jews — we must never forget it, it is part of history, children as long as the world lasts must know that this happened — but we badly need to accept it now as part of a terrible history, not the terrible history. I don’t want anyone to think that I diminish it, I don’t diminish it. It was the worst thing. But it was not the only thing.”

Sticking to the facts is the only way to avoid playing into the hands of people such as David Irving. “Untruth always matters,” she writes, “and not just because it is unnecessary to lie when so much terrible truth is available. Every falsification, every error, every slick rewrite job is an advantage to the neo-Nazis.” She is puzzled, too, by what she perceives as a reluctance to confront the truth by those who seem to have the most interest in it: “Why on earth have all these people who made Auschwitz into a sacred cow … why didn’t they go and look at Treblinka (which was an extermination camp)? It was possible. There were survivors alive when all this started. Nobody did. It was an almost pathological concentration on this one place. A terrible place — but it was not an extermination camp.” Then she sighs; and suddenly the fierceness leaves her. “The distinctions are important,” she says more quietly. “But — death is death.”

[…]

The German Trauma: Experiences and Reflections 1938-2001 is published on September 6

Abe Foxman: Disgrace to my Religion

By Monty Warner

www.frontpagemag.com/

August 21, 2001

AS AN EARLY TEEN, I was playing in a YMCA basketball league in Sumter, South Carolina, a leafy, sleepy southern town of about 35,000 where I was born and raised. Being of Jewish descent, I had to play for a Methodist team because the Jewish population in the county — indeed, in the state, at that time — was limited enough to preclude its own league. The YMCA was agreeable to this, and a few other Jewish kids from surrounding areas played as well.

After one of the games, I remember standing by the scoreboard. Ahead of me was one of the Jewish parents, shouting at one of the coaches. The woman wasn’t demanding more playing time for her son, nor was she a diehard seeking an explanation for why we were so bad that year. The woman, in full view of and to the distraction and discomfort of many, was demanding an apology from the coach for hurting her son’s feelings. The coach’s sin? Taking her boy out of the game for poor play and making him cry. I thought the whole episode somewhat amusing until two well-respected men in the community passed by, and I overheard one of them say to the other: “That is exactly why our kind has trouble with their kind.” Upon hearing this, I didn’t find myself offended; at thirteen years old, I found myself agreeing with them.

Today we have our very own national Jewish basketball mom. Just as shrill, just as petulant, just as obnoxious, and useless to boot. Our advocate, armed with a $50 million annual budget to ensure the meanies never get us, is Abraham Foxman. Foxman heads the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a once proud, worthy and worthwhile protector of Jews and their faith. Under Foxman’s brand of leadership, the ADL has devolved into an opportunistic, intolerant, grief-grubbing stench — a “rights” group for any and all who wish to feel offended — one which, in bottomless efforts to remain PC-safe, unconditionally aligns itself with groups like the Black Caucus and NAACP, both of which strongly support the pending anti-Semitic U.N. Conference on Racism. Think about that. You hate me, so by all means I support you. Why? Because I’m pathetic.

This past June, Carl Pearlston, a Board Member of the ADL and longtime loyalist to its early causes, resigned from the organization after 25 years of service. Pearlston began to receive increasingly hostile responses from other Board Members for his more conservative views, and was informed by Foxman that “he would have to realize that over 95% of those involved in the ADL were liberal and would be unsympathetic to his views.” Notwithstanding the adage that for every five Jews in the room there are 10 opinions on everything, the notion that 95 percent (or even 55 percent) of all Jews support bilingual education, gun control, feminism, affirmative action, abortion and the homosexual agenda across the board is not only unfathomable, but further evidence that Foxman has absolutely no legitimate claim to representing the interests of the Jewish masses.

For years now, despite numerous unflattering (and under-the-radar) news stories about his complicity in various scandals too numerous and squalid to confine to this space, Abraham Foxman has held himself and been held forth by others as one of the chief national political voices of Jewish people. His misuse of and/or recklessness with ADL funds (see Henry Lyons), his whorish behavior in the Marc Rich pardon, and his general odor in defending such cosmopolitan thuggery; to say nothing of self-righteous condemnations of what he arbitrarily decides to be someone else’s “intolerance,” is brought to the public’s attention almost weekly. Last year, during the presidential election, Foxman, using extreme examples, pulled incendiary comments off the Web to imply that anyone that didn’t want Joe Lieberman on the national ticket was probably anti-Semitic. Well, in some cases that’s entirely possible. It’s also possible that they simply thought Joe Lieberman was a putz. Or more significantly, they just might not have agreed with him on the issues. But the substance of disagreement is not important to Mr. Foxman. Regrettably, whatever legitimacy may have accompanied such charges has been diluted by the frequency with which Foxman lodges them, largely in an effort to secure more media attention to raise more money to continue the never-ending battle to tell everyone else how not to offend Abraham Foxman. To his credit, it’s a pretty good gig.

In April, Foxman was quoted in the New York Times assaulting David Horowitz’s campus ad campaign as “just another means of fomenting racism and hate.” The quip was so lacking in resonance it was almost as if he was walking out to lunch and asked what to do about the Horowitz situation, and in reply he said “put something together, use some of the old text, and throw in uh…racism and hate.” Instead of joining Horowitz in showing the guts to condemn the racist, anti-American black Left, Foxman threw his own to the wolves for a short-term political pop. Foxman: the man, the myth — the self-loathing maggot.

And so it is that, as an observer of all these “anti-hate, don’t hurt my feelings” campaigns, a logical, rational Jew can’t help but logically ask himself: “Exactly what is it that this man has ever actually accomplished?” Surely he can take credit for the fact that there might be one less KKK group in the world (which would bring the grand total to four), or the fact that more Jews are now allowed in certain country clubs (lawsuits have a way of greasing such processes)… but concretely, what is it that Abraham Foxman has done besides bend the ADL over for the Leftist agenda of the Democratic Party, and give much of America an image of most Jews as whiny, petulant, hate-thought shylocks? Sure, he sticks his nose in just about everything that gets him headlines (i.e. the future and futile U.N. Conference on Racism), but the real answer is pretty simple: not much.

To be sure, I am very proud of my heritage. I believe Jewish people are some of the most brilliant and determined people on the planet. From Walter Annenberg to Max Fisher to much of the work of Steven Spielberg, Jews have consistently risen from humble, even punishing beginnings to not only enjoy great power and success, but pave the way for others of all stripes to enjoy the same. And yet somewhere along the way — in oft-embarrassing displays of uninformed hyperemotion a la Foxman — many children and grandchildren of those who suffered so horribly in the Holocaust have awarded themselves the right to gripe about this country as if it were not the one that gave their ancestors their liberty. As if they themselves were in the Holocaust. As if we are all just one conservative Attorney General or High Court appointment away from being stripped of our “rights,” which have basically expanded to include what any sniveling Manhattan/LA liberal feels like doing at any given moment. The ignorance of how embarrassing, foolish and distasteful this is to the rest of the country is glaringly front and center, and a textbook example of how some Jews contribute heartily to their own alienation. This in turn allows hucksters such as Abraham Foxman to emerge — the kid nobody liked but who is determined to make others like you — and raise millions to salve the wounds of the very people he helps afflict with a crippling sense of victimhood.

Self-aggrandizing hustles such as this have in recent years become an indisputable national pastime. Angst-ridden souls with massive inferiority complexes now frequently cloak themselves in the mantras of groups such as “The National Organization for Women,” and then use the broad title to imply that they in fact represent everyone who might fall into such categories. This is a cynical, manipulative, outright lie, and in this regard there are few bigger demagogues than Abraham Foxman. Under his leadership, the mission statement of the ADL, the organization created solely to safeguard Jewish interests, now reads: “dedicated to translating democratic ideals into a way of life for all Americans in our time.” One translation would be aligning itself with Americans like the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, which in its school workshops has taken the liberty of edifying our teens on the finer points of “fisting.” Another translation is more simple: Whatever raises us money to continue projecting our misery onto you.

It is an old axiom in politics that the longer an assertion goes unchallenged, the quicker it becomes an article of faith. This axiom has lent significant legitimacy to people like Jesse Jackson and Abraham Foxman. No one questions them. No one looks at the sinister, highly unproductive leadership they have attempted to peddle to millions and stops for a moment to say: “Who anointed this person? What makes Abraham Foxman the ultimate arbiter of who is anti-Semitic and who isn’t? Is there a school for this? Why do I have to listen to him or Jesse Jackson as an authority on anything?” Of course, anyone who tenders such a challenge would immediately be branded a racist (or, in my case, a self-hating Jew) for not lining up to pull the collective pimp wagon, but at this point even that seems worthwhile. It is worthwhile because these men are not leaders. These men are liars — the corrupt, failed and demagogic sort — who have proven repeatedly that they will, to the clear detriment of their own people, pursue or create any cause that generates them media or money. To wit, one of Abe Foxman’s recent public forays on behalf of Jews was to loudly condemn the naming of the Hurricane Israel as discriminatory against Jews. If this is what has the Jewish community atwitter, then surely a lot of people have missed something. Moreover, that Mr. Foxman could even consider this to be a matter worth ten seconds of his life indicates that perhaps it’s time for him to begin to come to terms with the fact that he hasn’t accomplished much in it. In a Washington Post op-ed recently, Mr. Foxman almost gleefully talked up the pending U.N. Conference on Racism (which President Bush has wisely pulled the U.S. out of) as an excellent antidote to combat racism around the world. What he failed to foresee (or acknowledge in his zeal to support the Mutual Admiration Society event) was the potential for the U.S. to withdraw from the event, a move largely predicated on the insistence of Palestinians that language condemning Jews in very harsh tones be adopted for the Conference. Again, this is the leader of my people? I don’t think so. This is a snot-nosed man-child who represents everything neither I nor many other Jews want anything to do with. Leaders provide leadership, not handkerchiefs and crutches.

Monty Warner is Senior Director for the Center for the Study of Popular Culture. Readers may e-mail him at [email protected].

They came back from the dead to cheat their fellow man

New York’s Undocumented Day Laborers Fight for Their Piece of the Big Apple

On the Corner

The Village Voice

Week of July 25 — 31, 2001

Text and photographs by Michael Kamber

[…]

Teresa’s attitude is not unique. Resentment is high between the Satmar Jews of Williamsburg and a hundred or so Polish day laborers who clean for them. A half-century after the war, the slaughter of their brethren burns the Jews like a live wire. Ask nearly any Satmar to define the neighborhood and he or she will tell you, “We’re a community of Holocaust survivors.” They’re keenly aware that Poland’s large Jewish population was annihilated during the war. Ask the Polish women how they like their work, and many ignore the question: “The Jews blame us for the death camps in Poland,” they say. Echoing the Polish government’s longtime position, they add, “It was the Nazis that killed the Jews. Not the Polish people.”

[…]

[…] We are poor people; the average family here has 12 children; many of the husbands make less than they’re paying the cleaning woman. How can we pay them more?” A prominent local rabbi asks simply, “If they can make more elsewhere, why are they here working for us?”

[…]